Support Russia Insider - Go Ad-Free!

Here's Why The Pew Foundation's Recent Russia Survey Stinks

Hunting the Russophobes


This article originally appeared at Gordon Hahn's Blog


This is not the first time we have seen misleading information about Russia coming out of Pew, one of the richest charities in the US.  But the headline of their latest report was especially stinky.  Why?  Because it directly contradicts what we here at RI see every day in scouring the world media about Russia.  

<figcaption>Something stinks at the Pew Trusts</figcaption>
Something stinks at the Pew Trusts

By all accounts, Russia, and Putin, seem to be wildly popular outside of the developed world, where the media is doing its best to run a defamation campaign against the Russia and its leader.  He is seen as the one world leader willing to stand up to the neo-cons.  He is loved in the Middle East, Africa, South America, China, Southeast Asia, and India.  That is a lot of humanity.  

We didn't have the time to get into the Pew details, so we are delighted that the invaluable Gordon Hahn has done so.  Worth a read.  

We also noticed how the media had a field day with the Pew headline, triumphantly broadcasting it as gospel.  It is an interesting lesson in how deeply entrenched Russophobia is in the US establishment.


While I am not a fan of Russian President Vladimir Putin or any active politician, I am a fan of accuracy in reporting. In that regard I am no fan whatsoever of the Democratic Party mouthpiece, The Washington Post, or any U.S. or Russian mainstream media institutions (with the exception of Russia’s Ekho Moskvy radio and several daily newspapers, in particular Nezavisimaya gazeta). Here’s a good reason why.

On August 5th WP published an article on a Pew Center survey of public opinion around the world regarding Russia and Putin. The Pew Center’s headline was actually even more misleading than WP’s: “Russia, Putin held in Low Regard Around the World” (www.pewglobal.org/2015/08/05/russia-putin-held-in-low-regard-around-the-world/). Pew’s own data, which I will get to in a second, somewhat refutes this claim when you give China and India their proper weight.

WaPo’s Adam Taylor delivered the WaPo ‘whopper’: “Of the 39 countries polled, Pew found only three where the majority of people felt ‘a lot of confidence’ or ‘some confidence’ that Putin would do the right thing regarding world affairs” (www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/08/05/russia-loves-putin-the-rest-of-the-world-not-so-much/). The author’s slight of hand is to focus on the ‘majority’ in separate countries, emphasizing that only three countries have a majority trusting Putin. The problem is that in several more countries than just three, including the world’s two largest countries by population, more people trust than do not trust Putin. In China 54 percent trust Putin, 29 percent do not. In the world’s larges democracy, India, 35 percent – trust, 16 percent do not. That means that the countries making up 36 percent of the world’s population trust more than distrust Putin, and countries comprising a large majority of the population of the 39 countries survey do likewise. Moreover, Ethiopia, Ghana, Nigeria, Philippines, Tanzania, and Vietnam trust more than they distrust Putin. Thus, 8 of the 39 surveyed countries trust more than distrust Putin – hardly a win but not the near unanimous distrust spun by WaPo. Moreover, when country population is considered, Putin does notch a win.  (www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/08/05/russia-loves-putin-the-rest-of-the-world-not-so-much/).

If we unpack the meme ‘Putin’s Russia’ and just focus on Russia’s favorability/unfavorability in the eyes of the world, the picture is better for Russia but still not very good. Ten countries have a more favorable than unfavorable view of Russia, including China and India again: South Korea (46-43 percent), China (51-37), India (43-17), Vietnam (75-10), Nigeria (39-38), Uganda (37-34), Burkina Faso (34-29), Ghana (56-27), Tanzania (38-24), and Ethiopia (37-10). Three countries are split evenly: Philippines, Peru, and Senegal. The most unfavorable dispositions towards Russia are found in Poland and Jordan (80 percent), followed by Israel (74), Japan (73), and Ukraine (72) (www.pewglobal.org/2015/08/05/russia-putin-held-in-low-regard-around-the-world/).

There are some biases against Russia written into the methodology. There are numerous Russian allies and historically friendly countries that were not included in the survey. Not a single Slavic country besides antagonistic Poland and Ukraine is included (along with Russia). Besides Russia itself, again antagonistic Ukraine is the only country among the post-Soviet countries included. Excluding the Baltic states and Georgia, most of the post-Soviet states are favorably disposed towards Russia (www.pewglobal.org/2015/08/05/russia-putin-held-in-low-regard-around-the-world/).

Clearly Russia loses out to the U.S. in popularity by a large margin. Only 7 of the 39 countries viewed the U.S. more unfavorably than favorably. In order of unfavorability they are: Jordan (83 percent unfavorable), Russia (81), Palestinian Territories (70), Pakistan (62), Lebanon (60), Turkey (58), and China (49 unfavorable, 44 favorable) (www.pewglobal.org/2015/06/23/1-americas-global-image/). Thus, Russia’s population may be the most antagonistic to the U.S. in the world since the 2 percent difference between Russia and Jordan is within the margin of error.

Numerous commentators have asserted that Russia has nothing to fear from the West and NATO and that the real threats to Russia come from China in the east and jihadism from the south. However, if the attitudes of countries’ populations matter than Russia faces an axis of antagonism to its immediate west through the northern-central plain of running through Poland and Ukraine. Russia’s unfavorability in western Europe and the US is high extending that axis through Europe and across the Atlantic to the U.S. and Canada with their influential Polish and Ukrainian lobbies, wherefrom a good part of the pressure for NATO expansion first emerged two decades ago.


Support Russia Insider - Go Ad-Free!

Our commenting rules: You can say pretty much anything except the F word. If you are abusive, obscene, or a paid troll, we will ban you. Full statement from the Editor, Charles Bausman.