Support Russia Insider - Go Ad-Free!

5 Factors That Allowed Ukraine Far-Right to Thrive

From the point of view of Ukraine's hard left the far-right was not simply catapulted into prominence by EuroMaidan. Favorable conditions for its growth were laid in distant 1991 and compounded over time

A very interesting analysis from Borotba - a gathering of young, Ukrainian leftist activists. It provides insight into Ukraine from people who are intimately familiar with its recent history and society, and who have all the reason in the world to get at the difficult truth of what allowed for the meteoric rise of Ukraine's rise so as to better help reverse it.

One important factor article does not mention, however, is the western diplomatic, moral and media backing for right wing street fighters of EuroMaidan - which by now has become military support for Ukraine's far-right battalions (West equips Kiev which equips the volunteers).

This is an abridged version of an article that originally appeared at Borotba

1. State anti-communism and nationalism. 

The Ukrainian bourgeois state arose on the ruins of the Soviet Union. Its architect was that section of the Ukrainian Soviet bureaucracy which sought to participate in the privatization of public property. This part of the bureaucracy sought to dispose of public property on the territory of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic without the control of the central apparatus of the USSR. Therefore, the union of former Soviet bureaucrats with  nationalist forces became the basis for the formation of the new ruling class of “independent” Ukraine.

It should be noted that nationalism was the main public educational policy beginning in 1991, and periodic changes of presidents and governments, some of which were considered “pro-Russian,” made little difference.

The whole history of the Ukrainian people was taught in schools as the fight for an independent state, and the state which was created in 1991 was described as the implementation of an age-old dream of Ukrainians.

In parallel, the same educational system was riddled with anti-communism and tried to portray the Soviet Union as an “empire” oppressing Ukrainians and seeking to destroy the Ukrainian nation.

Several generations of young Ukrainians have grown up in this context of anti-communist and nationalist propaganda, and many of them formed the human basis for the fascist organizations.

2. Failure of the "communist revenge" in 1999. The presidential candidate of the Communist Party of Ukraine, Petro Symonenko, could have won the 1999 elections against right-wing incumbent President Leonid Kuchma. However, the Communist Party failed to unite with other leftists to support a single candidate, and then did not dare to oppose the unfair and rigged election results.

This indecision at the top of the Communist Party led to disillusionment in the left’s ability to take power and return the country to the socialist path of development. After 1999, the Communist Party lost support from election to election.

After President Yanukovych came to power in 2010, the Communist Party became part of the ruling coalition, abandoning the role of critic of the authorities’ socio-economic policies to the ultra-right forces.

3. Support for nationalist and neo-fascist forces during the regime of Yanukovych.

Yanukovych and his Party of Regions relied on the votes of the industrial and Russian-speaking eastern and southern regions of the country, lacking a growth of alternative political forces, especially the left. In turn, the political strategists of the regime sought to fragment the political field in the west and center of the country, supporting the nationalist forces with money and media.

4. The union of pro-Western neoliberals and Nazis against President Yanukovych became the nucleus of Euromaidan. Our organization wrote in winter 2014:

“The undoubted success of the nationalists is that they, due to their high level of activity, have managed to impose their ideological leadership on the Euromaidan.

This is evidenced by the slogans which have become a kind of ‘password’ for activists at mass gatherings on Maidan Square. The first is ‘Glory to Ukraine -- Glory to heroes!’, which, together with the raising of the right hand with straightened palm, was the salute of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists in April 1941.

Others include ‘Glory to the nation -- death to the enemy!’, ‘Ukraine above all’ (tracing back to the infamous German ‘Deutchland uber alles’), and ‘Whoever does not jump – is a Muscovite.’

The other opposition parties do not have a clear-cut ideological line or set of slogans, leading the liberal opposition to adopt  the nationalist slogans and nationalist agenda. "

Thus, the alliance of neoliberals and Nazis took place. While the neoliberals adopted the political program of the Ukrainian fascists, the Nazis agreed with carrying out the neoliberal line in the economy. This alliance was “sanctified” by representatives of Western imperialism, such as Catherine Ashton, Victoria Nuland and John McCain.

5. Support of Ukrainian big capital for Euromaidan, including its Nazi side. The largest owners and oligarchs were customers, sponsors and the main “beneficiaries” of Euromaidan.

The fact that oligarch-capitalists, such as Igor Kolomoisky, Petro Poroshenko, Dmitry Firtash, Sergei Taruta and, to a lesser extent, Rinat Akhmetov, allocated funding to Euromaidan, swept this movement into the media they control.

When the Euromaidan triumphed, those who previously governed the country indirectly, through the administration of Yanukovych, received direct control, including as governors of key areas, and oligarch Petro Poroshenko became president.

Thus, the coming to power of openly fascist forces, as well as the transition of mainstream right-wingers (such as Poroshenko and Yatseniuk) to fascist positions, was predictable and to some extent natural in the developing global economic crisis.

While the fascist forces were prepared for the development of the Ukrainian crisis, our resistance forces were not. After the seizure of power by the right-wing coup in February 2014, a semi-haphazard protest movement began to emerge, mainly in the southeast of the country. At first, its slogans were very modest, demanding only a certain degree of autonomy from the central government in Kiev, which took on a more and more clearly fascist character.

As soon as the regime consolidated its power, Kiev increased the pressure on the southeast with the help of paramilitary attacks by neo-Nazi groups, which radicalized the resistance. In the end, this resulted in a successful revolt in Donetsk and Lugansk and defeated uprisings in Odessa and Kharkov.

Due to the fragmentation of resistance forces, there was no coherent ideology or common goal in the uprisings. However, the general anti-fascist and anti-oligarchic orientation was healthy and clearly reflects the proletarian and semi-proletarian class composition of the resistance.

Today, the fascist regime in Kiev is greatly strengthened throughout the country, except for the territories controlled by the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics. Terror and intimidation have extinguished active street resistance to the regime.

Today there are probably several thousand political prisoners in Ukraine. There is de facto media censorship. “Communist propaganda" is officially banned. Ultra-right militant groups are legalized and integrated into the ranks of law enforcement agencies.

Under these conditions, the resistance groups, including our organization, are forced to work underground, as our comrades face not only charges of “propagating communism” (5 years or more in prison), but also “terrorism” (8 to 15 years in prison).

However, the resistance is alive. And not only in the People's Republics.

We believe that Ukraine will be free, will be socialist.

Support Russia Insider - Go Ad-Free!

Our commenting rules: You can say pretty much anything except the F word. If you are abusive, obscene, or a paid troll, we will ban you. Full statement from the Editor, Charles Bausman.

Add new comment