Because that makes sense
We still don't know who is responsible for the tragic terrorist attack in St. Petersburg this morning.
Isn't that amazing? We thought Russia only bombed LGBTQ activists and sand dunes in Syria. What kind of "moderate" rebel would plant an IED in a subway car thousands of kilometers away from Syria?
International relations expert (and professor) Max Abrahms points out the glaring hypocrisy that we are now seeing from mainstream outlets gloating about how the attack was "inevitable":
Islamic State has repeatedly threatened to stage attacks in Russia in revenge for the Russian bombing in Syria that started in September 2015.
Which is ironic, because for the last two years, each and every day we have read about how Russia is targeting "moderate rebels" who are fighting "Assad's tyranny".
Now all of a sudden Russia is a primary target for "retaliation" from terrorist groups in Syria? This doesn't make sense if you believe the mainstream media narrative about Syria.
And again: We don't know anything yet, although at least one Russian official has now confirmed that Moscow believes this to be a terrorist act.
But if Russia doesn't attack terrorists in Syria, why would they want to kill Russians in St. Petersburg? Such is the logic of CNN — if Syria has anything to do with this tragedy to begin with, and frankly right now no one knows.
Anyone is free to republish, copy, and redistribute the text in this content (but not the images or videos) in any medium or format, with the right to remix, transform, and build upon it, even commercially, as long as they provide a backlink and credit to Russia Insider. It is not necessary to notify Russia Insider. Licensed Creative Commons.