Support Russia Insider - Go Ad-Free!

5 Real Differences Between Scottish and Crimean Referendums

We've all witnessed the most blatant disregard for facts and the truth the last 14 months since Ukraine became a crucible for chaos. There's no more disturbing example of misinformation or propaganda than when offical government agents cross the line though. Here's a recent infraction. 

MORE: Opinion

The article originally appeared on Truth Seeker a Magazine by journalist Graham Phillips dedicated to truth in journalism. 

The official UK Ukrainian Twitter feed, which reads as if it’s written by a 13-year-old pro-Ukraine radical, has recently been trumpeting the seemingly official rhetoric below. Once you read my piece, I know most of your will be wondering at similar news of many governmental agencies taking an exceedingly bombastic tone. With proof to the contrary, what manner of policy must be behind such initiatives? You be the judge of the truth. 

All very convenient for a retweet. Sadly, complete gubbins – none of them were anywhere near Crimea at the time of the referendum. I was, and here’s the 5 real differences –

One - The Scottish referendum wasn’t held after a violent revolution (Euromaidan – pictured below) had installed a far-right government which had, as its defining aims the destruction of its history culture (from historical monuments to removal of Black Sea Fleet).

Graham Phillips in Ukraine

Two - Euromaidan deposed an elected president, and government, voted for democratically by the people of Crimea, who emphatically did not support Euromaidan. Why should they have been forced to accept a terrorist coup? (More Euromaidan pictured)

Euromaidan

Three - Access to Crimea was free to anyone who wanted to observe the referendum. I entered in a car with no licence plates without any letter of journalistic accreditation. (Russia Insider Editor's note: PUMPED)

Graham Phillips in Ukraine
Graham's Supersonic Station Wagon evaded security
 

Four - Any oppression or intimidation came on the side of those who wanted to support Russia, but were not allowed to do so. Several Crimean Tatars expressed to me they had been warned their homes would be burned down if they voted for Russia. Some Tatars even tried to remove ballot boxes, there was no security to stop them, locals stopped them. However, some Tatars openly supported Russia.

Five - There were no soldiers or guns at any of the polling stations. People voted freely, the result reflected the wishes of the vast, vast majority of Crimeans.


Support Russia Insider - Go Ad-Free!
MORE: Opinion

Our commenting rules: You can say pretty much anything except the F word. If you are abusive, obscene, or a paid troll, we will ban you. Full statement from the Editor, Charles Bausman.

Add new comment