Why Wasn't Putin Invited to Auschwitz Liberation Ceremony?
- A result of political disagreement Poland has with Russia
- Part of a larger trend for the Russian and Soviet role in WWII victory over Nazi Germany to be minimized
This article originally appeared at Fort Russ
In wedding and in funerals, one normally invites people who have some relation to the event, rather than strangers.
In light of that, one must seek a deeper explanation when attempting to understand the declaration of the Foreign Ministry of Poland not to extend a formal invitation to Russian President Vladimir Putin to the 70th year commemoration of the liberation of Auschwitz, scheduled for January 27, 2015.
One may argue that this is due to a political disagreement Poland may have with Russia, but then the event of Auschwitz should be sacred and beyond political disagreements or perhaps Polish politicians chose to play political games with an immense tragedy?
Captured Russian soldiers were successfully gassed by the Nazis in Auschwitz I in August 1941, and after several more successful experiments of gassing 1500 Russian Prisoners of War in the coming months, the Nazis went on to implement the same mechanism of mass murder in Auschwitz II- Birkenau on Jews.
A plaque in Auschwitz I explains how for Nazi Germany, not only were Russian soldiers an enemy, but the Russian and Soviet population at large.
The Nazis exterminated Russians en masse for a reason. The plaque explains that:
“the extermination policy of the Nazis also extended to the civilian population of the USSR.
In order to implement the policy, Nazi Germany defined in advance the categories of the population subject to mandatory extermination by special police forces and the Wehrmacht.
The “Generalplan Ost,” which was developed in the office of SS Reichsfuhrer Heinrich Himmler by April 1942, assumed that “without complete extermination” or without the weakening, by various means, of the “biological strength of the Russians,” it will be impossible to establish the rule of Germany in Europe.
That is why it is necessary “to destroy the Russians as a nation and disunite them.” With this in mind, the occupiers peacefully conducted mass executions under the pretext of fighting against partisans, which often led to the complete destruction of entire settlements.
For the same reason, they used Soviet force labor in complete disregard of their welfare, both in the Reich and in occupied territory… civilians from the occupied territories of the USSR were deported to Auschwitz, generally as a result of anti-partisan actions.”
It is only fitting therefore, that it was also the Red Army, composed of Russian soldiers and from the other Soviet republics, that liberated Auschwitz in January 27, 1945.
Furthermore, it was Russian soldiers, alongside other comrades in arms from the Eastern Bloc who liberated the capital of Poland, Warsaw, from the Nazis, one week earlier.
It is not only that the Red Army liberated the city in which the Polish Foreign Ministry is located, but it is also that due to the fact that 27 million Russians lost their lives in the hands of the Nazis who were viewed as an inferior race, it would have been appropriate to acknowledge that perhaps the Russian President as a representative of Russia would have some connection to the event.
However, this recent move can be seen as part of a wider process. American President Obama and British Prime Minister Cameroon took pride in the fact that their countries beat Nazism but failed to mention that Russia was their partner.
As Melanie McDonagh wrote in response to the audacious claim, “The collapse of the German war effort is impossible to conceive without considering the Soviet Union.”
Of course, this is not to say that the US did not play a major role in the defeat of the Nazis. Countless brave US soldiers gave their lives to defeat fascism.
The most difficult battles were for the most part in the East, however, and it was the USSR that liberated most of the occupied territory.
It appears, however, that over the years the central role played by the Red Army has been forgotten, possibly due to Western efforts to claim most of the credit and deny the role of the former partner.
For example, while in 1945, 57% of French respondents saw the USSR as playing the most crucial role in the defeat of Nazism, by 2004, only 20% of French respondents gave the USSR this role.
The Polish move then, cannot be fully understood apart of a systemic move to minimize the role of the USSR in the defeat of Nazism.
In fact, there is little doubt that the vast majority of occupied Europe was liberated by the Red Army who took on most of the casualties.
One would hope that at the ceremony at least, some representatives will realize that they forgot to invite the groom.
Click here for our commenting guidelines